Does Google Intend to Plunge into E-book Business?



The search behemoth Google has acquired eBook
Technologies Inc., which is a relatively new
company involved in e-book related technology.
The obvious conclusion is that the takeover spells
Google's intention to get into the e-Book reader
fray. What's open to conjecture is how? It may
go through the hardware route like the Kindle,
with its own e-book reader, but that's highly
unlikely since Google hasn't historically shown
any leaning towards the hardware aspect of the
business.
If you consider the history of eBook
Technologies, the company has been credited
with designing two e-book readers - one with
color screen and one with E-Ink screen - along
with the allied software meant to be deployed
with the e-book readers. So nothing conclusive
really comes out of the legacy of the company,
since it has both software and hardware know-
how.
However, this quote from a Google
spokesperson pretty much clears that up, "We
are happy to welcome eBook Technologies' team
to Google. Together, we hope to deliver richer
reading experiences on tablets, electronic readers
and other portable devices."
So it's more likely that we're looking at a possible
integration of the know-how from the newly
acquired company into Google's existing services,
or an altogether new e-book specific service of its
own. The search giant may even use this
knowledge base to integrate a dedicated e-book
platform into its ever popular Android platform.
Only time will tell what plans Google has in store
for e-books.


Source: Http://www.techtree.com/India/News/Does_Google_Intend_to_Plunge_into_E-book_Business/551-114162-643.html
READ MORE ................... Does Google Intend to Plunge into E-book Business?

Obama gets 31 million TV viewers in Tucson tribute.



LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Some 31 million U.S.
television viewers tuned in to see President
Barack Obama lead a memorial tribute to victims
of the deadly shooting rampage in Tucson,
Arizona, according to TV ratings provider
Nielsen.
The emotionally charged speech, in which
Obama urged Americans not to politicize a
tragedy that left six people dead and 13 others
wounded, drew generally high marks for his bid
to balance words of consolation with a call for
national unity.
The seven-network tally for Obama's 30-minute
address, carried live on Wednesday night from
the University of Arizona, topped the 29 million
viewers the president drew in August for his
speech on U.S. involvement in Iraq.
It fell just shy of the 32 million people who tuned
in to watch an address he delivered in June
about the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico,
Nielsen reported on Thursday.
By comparison, the most highly rated show on
U.S. television, Fox network's "American Idol,"
typically averages roughly 25 million viewers for
any given episode.
Obama commanded a bigger audience yet, 48
million viewers, with his last State of the Union
address in January 2010, according to Nielsen.


Source: Http://us.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70D0W620110114?ca=rdt
READ MORE ................... Obama gets 31 million TV viewers in Tucson tribute.

Verizon was 'never in the running' for original iPhone, says CEO.


Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg admitted in
an interview Thursday that the nation's
largest wireless network was "never in
the running" for the first-generation iPhone
because Apple was focused on the GSM
technology.

Seidenberg filled in details of the lengthy
negotiation process between Apple and Verizon
in an interview with journalist Charlie Rose of
BusinessWeek.
Rose's first question focused on the ongoing
debate over the relative merits of the AT&T and
Verizon networks. "Do you expect to have the
problems AT&T had with the iPhone?" Rose
asked.
As expected, Seidenberg remained confident in
Verizon's ability to withstand a glut of new iPhone
users, citing "a little-known fact" that the network
carries "almost as much data as [AT&T]." "We
think we're ready, and we're not going to talk
much about it. We're just going to let the
performance speak for itself," said Seidenberg.
According to Seidenberg, when Apple
approached carriers about the first-generation
iPhone, "it wanted one carrier in every major
market." Since Apple was focused on just one
technology, GSM, they chose AT&T. Verizon had
"good discussions" with them, but Apple wasn't
interested in building devices for GSM and CDMA.
As such, Verizon never ended up participating in
"the sort of mating dance" that AT&T and Apple
went through, because it was "never in the
running." Over the last three years, however,
Apple has been expanding to multiple carriers in
other markets, so Verizon "did have a lot of
discussion with them over the last couple years,"
Seidenberg noted.
When asked by Rose who initiated the talks,
Seidenberg admitted that he had called up Apple
CEO Steve Jobs and gone out to visit him.
Verizon President and COO Lowell McAdam
called up Apple COO Tim Cook and went to visit
him, as well.
"We consciously reached out to them more than
once. This was the view that we had
that...eventually their interests would align with
ours."
Seidenberg praised Jobs, calling the Verizon
iPhone "just another arrow in his quiver," while
also calling the partnership between Apple and his
company strategic because Verizon is "further
along in 4G" than the other carriers. "If you do
your job well," he continued, "then in an industry
like this, eventually the right partners are going to
end up on the dance floor."
During the interview, Seidenberg cited an
"hilarious" statistic: "90 percent of the traffic on
the Internet in five years will be video." According
to the executive, Verizon is "sitting in a position to
say that between our global Internet backbone,
our FiOS [residential fiber-optic network], and
now our nationwide wireless network, we're in a
position to put all the video that anybody wants
to put on any tablet, on any device, any television
set...anything they want.
"So we can have a lot of fun in the short term
banging heads with AT&T, but in the long term
it's going to open up a new market and allow us
to work with a great company like Apple to help
us develop products."
Seidenberg said he was fine with not having the
Verizon logo on the iPhone because the network
"has already proven that we're more than a one-
device company."
"We're going to continue to do a great job on the
BlackBerry and a great job on the Droid," he
added.
After 45 years of working at Verizon, Seidenberg
will retire later this year. McAdam is set to take
over as CEO.
Seidenberg's comments Thursday were in line
with those made by McAdam on Wednesday.
McAdam told Bloomberg in an interview that the
technical planning for the Verizon iPhone took
6-9 months.
Verizon announced the long-expected CDMA
iPhone Tuesday at a media event in New York
City Tuesday. The carrier will begin selling Apple's
popular smartphone on Feb. 10 for a starting
price of $199.
Analysts expect the network to put significant
"marketing muscle" behind the iPhone 4.


Source: Http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/01/14/verizon_was_never_in_the_running_for_original_iphone_says_ceo.html
READ MORE ................... Verizon was 'never in the running' for original iPhone, says CEO.